## PICUP Refractive Indices of Water and Air JavaScript Simulation Applet HTML5

introduction

Rainbows

Developed by E. Behringer

Easy JavaScript Simulation by Fremont Teng and Loo Kang Wee

This set of exercises guides the student in exploring primary and secondary rainbows. It requires the student to generate, observe, and describe plots of the deflection angles for light of different wavelengths and identify rainbow angles for different values of the relative index of refraction.

Subject Area Waves & Optics First Year and Beyond the First Year Python & Easy JavaScript Simulation Students who complete this set of exercises will be able to obtain and use information from peer-reviewed literature. Plot an equation over a range of values. Analyze and compare plots (Exercises 1 and 2); write the deflection angle in terms of the relative index of refraction to calculate the deflection angle of rays entering spherical drops (Exercises 3 and 4); produce and describe graphs of deflection angle versus incident angle for light of different wavelengths (Exercises 3 and 4). identify rainbow angles for light of different wavelengths (Exercises 3 and 4); and crudely estimate the intensity as a function of detection angle (Exercise 5). 120 min

1instructorguide

This set of exercises may be used in an introductory course that covers optics or in an upper-level optics course. The first three computational exercises are not demanding, but collectively provide an opportunity to deduce physical consequences (e.g., why is it that the primary and secondary rainbows are bright in particular directions). The last exercise is intended purely as a crude, ‘zeroeth order’ estimate of the irradiance as a function of deflection angle, purposefully neglecting polarization effects. Additional computational exercises have been described by D.S. Amundsen et al., Am. J. Phys. 77 (9), 795-798 (2009). An experimental apparatus to explore rainbows up to the 6th order has been described by G. Casini and A. Covello, Am. J. Phys. 80 (11), 1027-1034 (2012).

2theory

For Exercises 3 and 4, the theoretical concepts required are the Law of Refraction and the Law of Reflection, which are standard topics in introductory courses and are usually revisited in intermediate or advanced optics courses.

For Exercise 5, the crude model is nothing more than summing the irradiances associated with different rays, which implicitly assumes that the rays are incoherent with one another. Depending on the course, this can be contrasted with the ideas underlying the derivation of far field diffraction patterns - namely, that one works with the electric fields and carefully accounts for the relative phases of contributions from different parts of an extended source.

Exercise 1

### EXERCISE 1: OBTAIN AND USE INFORMATION FROM PEER-REVIEWED LITERATURE

Water and air are the two materials involved with producing rainbows we may see in the sky after a thunderstorm. To accurately predict where rainbows will appear, we need to have accurate information about the refractive indices of water and air.

(a) Obtain a copy of “Models for the wavelength dependence of the index of refraction of water”, Applied Optics 36 (16), 3785-3787 (1997) by Paul D.T. Huibers, and use Eq. (3) of that paper to generate a plot of the refractive index of water as a function of wavelength in the range from 400 to 650 nm.

(b) Obtain a copy of “Refractive index of air: new equations for the visible and near infrared”, Applied Optics 35(9), 1566-1573 (1996) by Philip E. Ciddor, and use Eq. (1) of that paper to generate a plot of , the deviation of the refractive index of air from unity, as a function of wavelength in the range from 400 to 650 nm.

Which material has the larger change in refractive index over the wavelength range from 400 to 650 nm? Calculate the ratio of the larger change to the refractive index of the material for a wavelength of 400 nm, and comment on the magnitude of the ratio.

3exercises

### EXERCISE 1: OBTAIN AND USE INFORMATION FROM PEER-REVIEWED LITERATURE

Water and air are the two materials involved with producing rainbows we may see in the sky after a thunderstorm. To accurately predict where rainbows will appear, we need to have accurate information about the refractive indices of water and air.

(a) Obtain a copy of “Models for the wavelength dependence of the index of refraction of water”, Applied Optics 36 (16), 3785-3787 (1997) by Paul D.T. Huibers, and use Eq. (3) of that paper to generate a plot of the refractive index of water as a function of wavelength in the range from 400 to 650 nm.

(b) Obtain a copy of “Refractive index of air: new equations for the visible and near infrared”, Applied Optics 35(9), 1566-1573 (1996) by Philip E. Ciddor, and use Eq. (1) of that paper to generate a plot of nair1${n}_{air}-1$, the deviation of the refractive index of air from unity, as a function of wavelength in the range from 400 to 650 nm.

Which material has the larger change in refractive index over the wavelength range from 400 to 650 nm? Calculate the ratio of the larger change to the refractive index of the material for a wavelength of 400 nm, and comment on the magnitude of the ratio.

### EXERCISE 2: DEFLECTION ANGLE FOR A LIGHT RAY ENTERING A SPHERICAL RAINDROP

Assume that a light ray incident on a spherical raindrop at an angle θ1i${\theta }_{1i}$ measured with respect to the surface normal undergoes one internal reflection before leaving the raindrop, as shown below.



Show that if θiθ1i${\theta }_{i}\equiv {\theta }_{1i}$ and θrθ1t${\theta }_{r}\equiv {\theta }_{1t}$, then the deflection angle δ$\delta$ of the light ray is (in radians):

δ=2(θiθr)+(π2θr)(1)$\begin{array}{}\text{(1)}& \delta =2\left({\theta }_{i}-{\theta }_{r}\right)+\left(\pi -2{\theta }_{r}\right)\end{array}$

The deflection angle δ$\delta$ is the angle between the incident ray and the outgoing ray, and θr${\theta }_{r}$ is the angle of refraction for the light ray incident from air and entering water. To compute the deflection angle, what quantities must be known?

### EXERCISE 3: COMPUTE THE DEFLECTION ANGLE VERSUS INCIDENT ANGLE

Generate a plot of the deflection angle δ$\delta$ as a function of incident angle θi${\theta }_{i}$ for light rays of wavelength 400 nm that experience one internal reflection in the raindrop. Compare, on the same plot, the deflection angle for light rays of wavelength 650 nm. The two curves should have minima that are close to each other, but not identical. What are the values of the incident angle corresponding to these two minima? Assuming that these minima correspond to the rainbow direction, what direction do you have to look relative to the horizontal to see the bright red band of the rainbow? What direction do you have to look relative to the horizontal to see the bright violet band? Which band appears higher in the sky?

Near the minimum of the deflection function (that is, the δ(θi)$\delta \left({\theta }_{i}\right)$ curve), are two rays with slightly different incident angles deflected into different directions? Regarding the brightness of the deflected light perceived by an observer, what is implied by your answer?

### EXERCISE 4: WHERE IS THE SECONDARY (DOUBLE) RAINBOW?

Repeat the computation of Exercise 3, but now assume that the ray undergoes two internal reflections within the raindrop. In this case, show that the deflection angle is given by

δ=2(θiθr)+2(π2θr)(2)$\begin{array}{}\text{(2)}& \delta =2\left({\theta }_{i}-{\theta }_{r}\right)+2\left(\pi -2{\theta }_{r}\right)\end{array}$

and plot the deflection angle versus the incident angle for rays of wavelength 400 nm and 650 nm. The two curves should have minima that are close to each other, but not identical. What are the values of the incident angle corresponding to these two minima? Assuming that these minima correspond to the rainbow direction, what direction do you have to look relative to the horizontal to see the bright red band of the secondary rainbow? Can a ground based observer see these rays? Do the rays that produce the secondary rainbow enter the top of the raindrop? What direction do you have to look relative to the horizontal to see the bright violet band? Which band appears higher in the sky?

Near the minimum of the deflection function (that is, the δ(θi)$\delta \left({\theta }_{i}\right)$ curve), are two rays with slightly different incident angles deflected into different directions? Regarding the brightness of the deflected light perceived by an observed, what is implied by your answer?

### EXERCISE 5: CRUDE ESTIMATE OF THE IRRADIANCE VERSUS DEFLECTION ANGLE FOR A SINGLE WAVELENGTH: PRIMARY RAINBOW

Assume that the each outgoing ray produces an irradiance that is equal to I(θ)=I0exp[(θδ)2]$I\left(\theta \right)={I}_{0}\mathrm{exp}\left[-\left(\theta -\delta {\right)}^{2}\right]$ where here the angles are assumed to be in degrees and the implied width of this distribution is 1${1}^{\circ }$. (For simplicity, we neglect the loss of intensity during refraction and internal reflection. This is a huge oversimplification, but it allows us to focus on adding up contributions from each ray.) Sum up the contributions from rays uniformly distributed over the scaled impact parameter b~=b/R$\stackrel{~}{b}=b/R$ to compute the overall irradiance as a function of deflection angle for light of wavelength 400 nm. Plot the resulting irradiance distribution versus deflection angle for a single wavelength. How does this plot help explain why the rainbow is bright?

Code Rainbows_Exercise_1.py

#

# Rainbows_Exercise_1.py

#

# Plot separately the refractive indices of

# water and air, based on peer-reviewed literature

#

# The refractive index of water is taken from

# Eq. 3 of P.D.T Huibers, Applied Optics,

# Vol. 36, No. 16, pp. 3785-3787 (1997).

#

# The refractive index of air is taken from

# Eq. 1 of P.E. Ciddor, Applied Optics,

# Vol. 35, No. 9, pp. 1566-1573 (1996).

#

# Written by:

#

# Ernest R. Behringer

# Department of Physics and Astronomy

# Eastern Michigan University

# Ypsilanti, MI 48197

# (734) 487-8799

# This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

#

# 20160109 by ERB add plots of index versus wavelength

#

from pylab import figure,plot,xlim,xlabel,ylim,ylabel,grid,title,show

from numpy import linspace

# Define the index of refraction function for water

def water_index(wavelength):

n_H2O = 1.31279 + 15.762/wavelength - 4382.0/(wavelength**2) + 1.1455e6/(wavelength**3)

return(n_H2O)

# Define the index of refraction function for air

# Note: wavelength is supposed to be in micrometers

def air_index_minus_one(wavelength):

term1 = 0.05792105/(238.0185 - 1.0e6/(wavelength**2))

term2 = 0.00167917/(57.362 - 1.0e6/(wavelength**2))

return(term1+term2)

# Inputs

lambda_lo = 400.0 # low value of the wavelength [nm]

lambda_hi = 700.0 # high value of the wavelength [nm]

npts = 301 # number of points for the array of wavelengths

# Generate the array of wavelengths

wavelengths = linspace(lambda_lo,lambda_hi,npts)

# Calculate the refractive indices

n_water = water_index(wavelengths)

n_air = 1.0 + air_index_minus_one(wavelengths)

#----------------------------------------------------------------------

# Start a new figure. This will be a plot of

# refractive index of water versus wavelength.

figure()

# Set the limits of the horizontal axis

xlim(lambda_lo,lambda_hi)

# Label the horizontal axis

xlabel("$$\\lambda$$ [nm]", size = 16)

# Set the limits of the vertical axis

ylim(1.325,1.345)

# Label the vertical axis

ylabel("$$n_{water}$$", size = 16)

# Draw a grid

grid(True)

# Make the title

title("$$n_{water}$$ versus wavelength $$\\lambda$$\n Appl. Opt. Vol. 36, Pg. 3785 (1997)")

# Plot the refractive index of water versus wavelength

plot(wavelengths,n_water,"m-")

show()

#----------------------------------------------------------------------

# Start a new figure. This will be a plot of

# refractive index of air versus wavelength.

figure()

# Set the limits of the horizontal axis

xlim(lambda_lo,lambda_hi)

# Label the horizontal axis

xlabel("$$\\lambda$$ [nm]", size = 16)

# Set the limits of the vertical axis

ylim(2.75e-4,2.85e-4)

# Label the vertical axis

ylabel("$$n_{air} - 1$$", size = 16)

# Draw a grid

grid(True)

# Make the title

title("$$n_{air} - 1$$ versus wavelength $$\lambda$$\n Appl. Opt. Vol. 35, Pg. 1566 (1996)")

# Plot the refractive index of air minus one

plot(wavelengths,air_index_minus_one(wavelengths),"m-")

show()

4solutions

### Exercise 1: Obtain and use information from peer-reviewed literature

The plot for the refractive index of water should look like:

The plot for the deviation of the refractive index of air from unity should look like:

### Exercise 2: Deflection angle for a light ray entering a spherical raindrop

To calculate the deflection angle, one needs to know the refractive index of the air and the water at the particular wavelength and also the angle of incidence of the incoming ray. The laws of refraction and reflection are then applied to obtain the angles of refraction and the angle of reflection for the internal reflection. Students should be able to show that the equalities shown in the figure illustrating the ray/raindrop geometry.

### Exercise 3: Compute the deflection angle versus incident angle

The solution for Exercise 3 is:

The minimum of the deflection function for λ=400$\lambda =400$ nm (λ=650$\lambda =650$ nm) is δ=139.3$\delta ={139.3}^{\circ }$ (δ=137.6)$\left(\delta ={137.6}^{\circ }\right)$. This means that you must look (with the sun at your back and the distant raindrops in front of you) at an angle of 180139.3=40.7${180}^{\circ }-{139.3}^{\circ }={40.7}^{\circ }$ (180137.6=42.4)$\left({180}^{\circ }-{137.6}^{\circ }={42.4}^{\circ }\right)$ relative to the horizontal to see the bright violet (red) band of the rainbow. So the red band appears above the violet band. (It really does!) It is worth noting that the rays producing the primary rainbow enter the top half of the raindrops.

### Exercise 4: Where is the double (secondary) rainbow?

The solution for Exercise 4 is:

The minimum of the deflection function for λ=400$\lambda =400$ nm (λ=650$\lambda =650$ nm) is δ=233.3$\delta ={233.3}^{\circ }$ (δ=230.2$\delta ={230.2}^{\circ }$). These rays are directed back up into the sky and the ground-based observer wonâ€™t see them. However, if you realize that you have just computed the deflection angles for rays entering the bottom half of the raindrop, you realize that you must look (with the sun at your back and the distant raindrops in front of you) at an angle of 233.3180=53.3,,(230.2180=50.2)${233.3}^{\circ }-{180}^{\circ }={53.3}^{\circ },,\left({230.2}^{\circ }-{180}^{\circ }={50.2}^{\circ }\right)$ relative to the horizontal to see the bright violet (red) band of the rainbow. So the red band of the secondary rainbow appears below the violet band. (It really does!). Thus the rays producing the secondary rainbow enter the bottom half of the raindrops and the order of the color bands is reversed relative to the primary rainbow. Comparing these angles to those from Exercise 3, we see that the secondary rainbow appears above the primary rainbow. The reduced brightness of the secondary rainbow is due to the additional internal reflection and the corresponding loss of irradiance during that reflection. It is posible to extend Exercises 3 and 4 to account for the change in intensity occurring for every refraction or internal reflection. For fun, it must be noted that fascination with the double rainbow became an Internet meme in 2010 when a person living on the border of Yosemite National Park recorded his reaction to a spectacular double rainbow. At the time of writing, the video can be seen at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQSNhk5ICTI).

### Exercise 5: Crude estimate of the irradiance versus deflection angle for a single wavelength: Primary Rainbow

The solution for Exercise 5 is:

Note that irradiance is distributed over a large range of detection angles, and that the irradiance has a peak near (but not at) the minimum of the deflection function for these chosen parameters. If we use an angular width smaller than 1${1}^{\circ }$ for the assumed irradiance distribution of a ray, the irradiance peak approaches the minimum in the deflection angle and the “background irradiance” decreases. The main result is that irradiance accumulates in the direction specified by the minimum in the deflection function because several rays are deflected into essentially the same direction. This is known as rainbow scattering, and it is also observed in scattering events such as atomic/molecular collisions or ion collisions with ordered surfaces.

5references

Most introductory textbooks mention rainbows and the angles at which they can be observed, but do not necessarily explain why rainbows are bright. This set of exercises is intended to show how irradiance “piles up” around the minima of the deflection functions calculated in Exercises 3 and 4.

### Translations

Code Language Translator Run

### Software Requirements

SoftwareRequirements

 Android iOS Windows MacOS with best with Chrome Chrome Chrome Chrome support full-screen? Yes. Chrome/Opera No. Firefox/ Samsung Internet Not yet Yes Yes cannot work on some mobile browser that don't understand JavaScript such as..... cannot work on Internet Explorer 9 and below

### Credits

Fremont Teng; Loo Kang Wee; based on Ernest R. Behringer python code

[text]

## Refractive Indices of Water and Air JavaScript Simulation Applet HTML5

### Instructions

#### Control Panel

Editing the inputs in the field boxes will change their minimum/maximum and number of points respectively.

#### Toggling Full Screen

Double clicking anywhere in the panels will toggle full screen.

#### Reset Button

Resets the simulation.

Research

[text]

[text]

[text]